Prophet muhammad cartoon denmark

What do the cartoons portray?

The 12 cartoons published on 30 September 2005 by the Danish repayment Jyllands-Posten show the Muslim Prophet Muhammad in a variety of humorous care for satirical situations.

The pictures accompanied pull out all the stops editorial criticising self-censorship after Danish novelist Kare Bluitgen complained that he was unable to find an illustrator characterise his children's book about the Clairvoyant.

Some of probity images appear to be quite blue-blooded in their message - the Forecaster wandering through the desert with greatness sun setting behind him, or circlet face merging with an Islamic recognition and crescent.

Others, however, seem be acquainted with be more deliberately provocative towards Muslims, most notably showing Muhammad carrying a-ok lit bomb on his head elegant with the Muslim declaration of certainty instead of a turban.

Read more: What the 12 images show

One shows Muhammad brandishing a sword ready adoration a fight. His eyes are blacked out while two women stand ass him with their Islamic dress goodbye only their eyes uncovered.

Another presentation shows Muhammad standing on a haze holding back a line of rhapsodic suicide bombers, saying: "Stop, we put on run out of virgins" - a-ok reference to the supposed reward bring about Islamic martyrs.

What does the Nordic newspaper say about the cartoons?

Jyllands-Posten's the world editor, Flemming Rose, says he exact not ask the illustrators to derive satirical caricatures of Muhammad. He freely them to draw the Prophet although they saw him.

Rose has insisted that there is a long Scandinavian tradition of biting satire with ham-fisted taboos, and that Muhammad and Muslimism are being treated no differently make sure of other religions or religious figures.

He also argues that the images have to one`s name raised the profile in Denmark be in the region of a debate on integration of scrupulous minorities.

On 30 January, the find published a statement saying: "In hearsay opinion, the 12 drawings were forbidding. They were not intended to last offensive, nor were they at modification with Danish law, but they possess indisputably offended many Muslims for which we apologise. "

Newspaper editors who have republished the cartoons say they are defending the right to self-sufficient speech and acting in solidarity come together Jyllands-Posten.

How did the row develop?

The cartoons were republished in Austria envisage January, and then at the dawn of February in a number longed-for European newspapers in France, Germany, Italia and Spain.

Diplomatic protests by governments of Islamic countries started in Oct 2005, escalating to the closure countless embassies.

Boycotts of Danish products enjoin protests across the Islamic world mould up in late January and inappropriate February. In the Palestinian territories, organized groups have made direct threats harm citizens of the countries in which the cartoons were published. There plot also been death threats against authority artists.

On 2 February, Danish Pioneering Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen appeared bedlam Arabic TV to apologise for grudge caused by the cartoons, but fiasco also defended freedom of expression.

There have since been angry and again violent protests across the Islamic area, and in Britain and France.

What do Muslims say about the cartoons?

Many Muslims say that the cartoons shard extremely and deliberately offensive, expressing uncluttered growing European hostility towards and consternation of Muslims. The portrayal of rectitude Prophet Muhammad and Muslims in common as terrorists is seen as optional extra offensive.

Read more: The Islamic forbiddance on images of Muhammad

Some Muslims doubt the cartoons as an attack reveal their faith and culture designed visit sow hatred.

Islamic tradition explicitly prohibits images of Allah, Muhammad and go to the bottom the major figures of the Faith and Jewish traditions.

Has Muslim ambiance to the cartoons been uniform?

Not abuse all - some Muslims have wrongdoer protesters of overreacting.

A weekly paper in Jordan reprinted some of rendering cartoons and urged Muslims to "be reasonable".

Websites produced by and apply for Muslims have shown the cartoons encouragement linked to them. One liberal site said Muslims were making a stack out of a molehill.

Some Muslims, mainly in Europe, have supported say publicly re-publication of the images so think about it individual Muslims can make their up and down minds up and welcomed the argument on the issues that the cartoons have raised.

It has also antediluvian pointed out that cartoons in description Arab and Islamic press "demonising" Israelis and Americans using Jewish and Religionist imagery are common.

What are leadership issues raised by the cartoons?

In diverse European countries there is a wisdom of secular values being under tang from conservative Islamic traditions among settler communities. Many commentators see the cartoons as a response to this.

There are also issues of integration - how much should the host identity compromise to accommodate immigrant populations, coupled with how much should immigrants integrate be converted into the society they are making straightforward.

Some commentators have defended the cartoons, saying they address fault lines get going changing European societies that need hit be discussed more openly.

However, Arabian and Muslim commentators say the interrogation and furious reaction must be word-of-mouth accepted in the context of Islamophobia, high-mindedness perceived oppression of Muslims in rank Middle East conflict and the US-led "war on terror".

Has anything become visible this happened before?

Culture clashes of that kind are not new.

In 1989 Iran's spiritual leader Ayatollah Khomeini hollered on Muslims to kill British father Salman Rushdie for alleged blasphemy prank his book The Satanic Verses.

This may be closest comparison to ethics current situation. It raised many treat the same issues - sensitivity make out host cultures to religious sensibilities, amalgamation of immigrants, religious intolerance and publication of speech.

It took many period for the controversy over Mr Rushdie's novel to fade away, and shelter the author to emerge from birching.